On Tuesday morning, Marvin Lewis told the local media, in more or less words, if Chad wants to threaten to sit out, be a man of your word and do it.
There are rumors that other organizations are making a play to get Chad out of Cincinnati, but Marvin isn't backing off his original defense of not trading Chad.
Some of the offers, if true, sound great, but why let Chad get his way? I know Mike Brown, Marvin Lewis, the coaches and 53 players aren't in the business of "making examples". They are paid to win football games. But, if Chad gets traded, he wins. I say well done to Marvin Lewis and the front office if they call Chad's bluff and mean it...forcing him to sit out the season.
What do you think of Marvin's statement? Do you want the Bengals to trade Chad and get something in return or would you rather Chad sit like he threatened?
No comments:
Post a Comment